Therefore, general WM cannot be measured using this test, in our opinion, and more studies are thus required to measure WM effectively and examine the association between WM and CI performance with a focus on Persian language. Furthermore, PASAT appears to involve the storage and processing tasks (memorizing the previous digit and add it to the next one and so on) of only minimal information chunks (i.e., the digit), while WM is a combination of storing and processing longer chunks (e.g., a sentence, several digits, etc.). However, PASAT is frequently used to evaluate attentional functioning and information processing (Tombaugh 2006). Khatib administered the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) to measure WM capacity. However, memory training is not focused in the present study. Yenkimaleki and Van Heuven (2017) reported that memory training had a positive effect on the quality of CI. (2020) focused on WM and note quantity in CI, and as part of the findings, they reported that WM can be used as a reliable factor for predicting CI performance. This language pair has rarely been explored in this domain (Amini, Dabaghi and Nejadansari 2020 Khatib 2003 Yenkimaleki and Van Heuven 2017). The project reported in this article included 30 MA translation students as proficient bilinguals and early learners of CI, and had the further aim of probing the role of WM in short CI performance and gender differences in WM and CI performance in the English-Persian language pair. Therefore, this research intended to shed more light on these. Two main problems motivated the authors to carry out the present study: a lack of proper attention given to CI, especially with a focus on Persian language, and the paucity of studies devoted to gender differences in interpreting. Dong and Cai (2015) further argue that considering the close match between CI process, which includes mental and material storage (i.e., notes on paper) and storage-plus-processing definition of WM, studying the role of WM in CI is more promising than studying its role in SI. Consequently, the effect of WM in CI is unclear. According to Dong and Cai (2015), the studies in this domain have mainly been devoted to Simultaneous Interpreting (SI) and a few empirical investigations have been conducted on WM in the context of CI. Nevertheless, it is hard to arrive at any proper conclusions, especially in the context of CI, which has only rarely been addressed. According to Baddeley and Hitch’s multi-component model of WM (1974) and its later version introduced by Baddeley (2000), there are four components: central executive, phonological loop, visuospatial sketchpad, and episodic buffer.Īs Köpke and Nespoulous (2006) mention, many authors have investigated the importance of WM. The multi-component model is among those applied in the studies of WM in interpreting. Since its emergence in 1974, WM has been presented using various models (Baddeley 1986, 2000, 2007, 2010 Baddeley and Hitch 1974 Baddeley and Logie 1999 Cowan 1988, 1999, 2005 etc.). Dehn (2008) points out that WM is one of the most important concepts introduced in cognitive psychology. WM has been traditionally conceptualized as an active memory system that is responsible for the temporary maintenance and processing of information (Bayliss et al. One of the cognitive components underlying interpreting is Working Memory (WM), which is regarded as a key factor in interpretation (Bajo, Padilla and Padilla 2000 Darò 1989).īaddeley and Hitch (1974), as a modification of the concept of short-term memory, proposed the concept of working memory. As Dong and Cai (2015) put it, CI is a cognitively demanding activity compared to other human activities because it includes a comprehension of input from the source language, either storing this input via note taking, storing it mentally, or a combination of both, and then producing a coherent target text. In interpreter-mediated events, Consecutive Interpreting (CI) is regarded as an important interpreting modality, which enables people who speak different languages to communicate with each other in various settings (e.g., at the police station, court, press conference, etc.).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |